March 1st 2006 Issue

Apple attractant not found yet

By |March 1st, 2006|

Researchers have been unable to duplicate whatever it is in apples that attracts codling moths. Dr. Peter Landolt, [...]

Lodi rules

By |March 1st, 2006|

Frustrated by low returns compared to their counterparts in the Napa Valley, wine grape growers in Lodi, California, are [...]

New controls for cherry pests

By |March 1st, 2006|

Oregon State University scientists, in the search for more selective alternatives to traditional broad-spectrum pesticides, are testing a variety [...]

Breakthrough in codling moth control

By |March 1st, 2006|

Dr. Doug Light with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Western Regional Research Center in Albany, California, and Dr. Alan [...]

Partnering with environmentalists

By |March 1st, 2006|

The Lodi-Woodbridge Winegrape Commission worked with Protected Harvest, the third-party certifier, for nearly two years in developing the Lodi [...]

Pest control costs worry growers

By |March 1st, 2006|

Orchardists participating in a research trial that evaluated reduced-risk pest management say that the reduced-risk practices are effective, but [...]

Target pear psylla early

By |March 1st, 2006|

The most effective time to control pear psylla is early in the season, Washington State University entomologist Dr. John [...]

Survival means growing better fruit with less labor

By |March 1st, 2006|

Many Washington State tree fruit growers have been slow to adopt technology in the orchard so far, but unless [...]

RAMP focuses on reduced-risk pest controls

By |March 1st, 2006|

Apples and peaches, high-value crops in eastern United States, were the focus of a regional research project aimed at [...]

Psylla is everyone’s problem

By |March 1st, 2006|

Pear psylla is not an individual orchardist’s problem—it is a neighborhood issue. The pest disperses in the winter [...]